88 Notes

essdogg:

crazycolours:

crappleton:

lilian-lies:

dabos:

9gag:
How can this be true?

: O

Even weird-er.. if you add the areas of all the shapes together (assuming that each square is 1 unit) you would get an area of 32 units. However if you find the area of the entire triangle on top (as one piece), you get 32.5, the bottom? 31.5
weird

I hate you, this is going to bug the fuck out of me.

Can one of you Mathy Mathertons please answer this question now? I won’t be able to work anymore today until it is answered.

Your eye thinks it’s seeing two large triangles made up of four pieces in the top and bottom pictures, but it isn’t. In reality the red and green smaller triangles have slightly different slopes, so that’s actually a four-sided poloygon and not a triangle at all.
In the top pic, they pinch inwards a little, so overall that arrangement takes up less space. In the bottom pic, they bulge outwards a little, so that arrangement takes up more space. The difference in the space taken up by the bulge and pinch is exactly one square, and that creates the gap in the lower picture.
You can see this if you closely examine the background grid along that diagonal line.

essdogg:

crazycolours:

crappleton:

lilian-lies:

dabos:

9gag:

How can this be true?

: O

Even weird-er.. if you add the areas of all the shapes together (assuming that each square is 1 unit) you would get an area of 32 units. However if you find the area of the entire triangle on top (as one piece), you get 32.5, the bottom? 31.5

weird

I hate you, this is going to bug the fuck out of me.

Can one of you Mathy Mathertons please answer this question now? I won’t be able to work anymore today until it is answered.

Your eye thinks it’s seeing two large triangles made up of four pieces in the top and bottom pictures, but it isn’t. In reality the red and green smaller triangles have slightly different slopes, so that’s actually a four-sided poloygon and not a triangle at all.

In the top pic, they pinch inwards a little, so overall that arrangement takes up less space. In the bottom pic, they bulge outwards a little, so that arrangement takes up more space. The difference in the space taken up by the bulge and pinch is exactly one square, and that creates the gap in the lower picture.

You can see this if you closely examine the background grid along that diagonal line.

Replies

Likes

  1. stardore reblogged this from 9gag
  2. vibewithvaline reblogged this from jolorustia
  3. ruryon reblogged this from 9gag
  4. kritochin reblogged this from 9gag and added:
    ohhh!!kien sabe como??
  5. re-ne-gade reblogged this from 9gag
  6. essdogg reblogged this from shanecyr and added:
    Thanks, everyone. Did I mention that I have two thumbs? Or that they’re double-jointed? Just saying.
  7. carekoba reblogged this from jolorustia
  8. shanecyr reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    I think this: the small triangle has a ratio of 5:2, while the larger one has a ratio of 8:3. That means they can’t have...
  9. thedza reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    Hold on just a minute while I walk over to the color printer.
  10. penllawen reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    Your eye thinks it’s seeing two large triangles made up of four pieces in the top and bottom pictures, but it isn’t. In...
  11. do-over reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    You know I won’t be able to concentrate for a good long while now. Sheesh.
  12. squibble reblogged this from essdogg and added:
    The triangles are NOT the same. Yes the parts are the same, but rearranging them in the top configuration leaves the...
  13. luvhex reblogged this from 9gag and added:
    can’t figure :

 

Reblogs